PERCENT1^

	
	396

≙ PERCENT1^ (1 token)
1178761 hh06 | 61+f    You can see a burger and a bottle with alcohol in it.
r
l	HAMBURGER-FOOD1*	ALCOHOL2*	ALCOHOL2*	PERCENT1^*
m	…	alkohol	alkohol	null null
= PERCENT1 (47 tokens)
	Mouth: prozent
	frontal 45° 90° from above
	Translational equivalent: percent
by transcript | by glosses | by right neighbours | by left neighbours
1181159 stu09 | 18-30m    As a deaf person, I get 100% [degree of disability] on my disabled person‘s pass.
r	DEAF1B	ID-CARD1	$NUM-HUNDRED2*	PERCENT1	$GEST-OFF1^
l
m		ausweis	hun{dert}	prozent
1211752 stu06 | 18-30f    All together, it comes up to 100 percent but these 100 percent you never achieve.
r	EXAMPLE1*	EVERYTHING1A	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1d	PERCENT1	PEOPLE2*	EVERYTHING1A*
l
m	bei{spiel}		hundert	prozent	leute
1211752 stu06 | 18-30f    If a majority, let’s say 80%, voted for Friday and only 20% for Saturday, the party will rather be on Friday.
r	OF-ALL-THINGS1B^	FRIDAY3B	$NUM-TENS2A:2d*	PERCENT1	$INDEX1*	MORE1*	$INDEX1
l
m		freitag	zw{anzig}	prozent		mehr
1209077 mue06 | 18-30f    Having a CI you're still 100 percent disabled.
r		QUOTATION-MARKS3*			SEVERELY-DISABLED1*
l	ALSO1A		$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1	PERCENT1
m	auch	[MG]	hundert	prozent	behindert
1211752 stu06 | 18-30f    And I’m classed at 140%, not at 85%.
r	I1	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1d*	$NUM-TENS2A:4	PERCENT1	MORE7B	NOT3A	I1
l
m	…	hundertvierzig		prozent		nicht
1211752 stu06 | 18-30f    And I’m classed at 140%, not at 85%.
r	I1	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:5*	$NUM-TENS2A:8d*	PERCENT1
l
m		fünf{und}achtzig		pro{zent}
1413683 ber02 | 46-60m    Before the fall of the Berlin Wall, almost 80% of the deaf people still had a job, whereas only 20% were unemployed.
r	WALL3*	ALMOST3	$NUM-TENS2A:8d*	PERCENT1	TO-WORK1*	PRESENT-OR-HERE1*	$NUM-TENS2A:2*
l
m	mauer	fast	achtzig	prozent	arbeit	da	zwanzig
1418889 ber08 | 31-45f    Through the interpreter, I was able to catch 50% of what was being said.
r	TO-TRANSFER1C^*	TO-TRANSFER1C^*			TO-TEACH1*
l			$NUM-TENS2A:5*	PERCENT1
m			fünfzig	prozent
1418889 ber08 | 31-45f    The other 60% were lost to me. That was a really stupid situation.
r		REMAINS1A	$NUM-TENS2A:6d*
l				PERCENT1	I2	TO-COMPREHEND1	NOT3A
m		rest	sechzig	prozent	ich	begreife	nicht
1413703 ber02 | 46-60m    The lower limit shouldn’t be at 55% but at perhaps 70% [decibel is what he meant].
r	PERCENT7	NOT3A	MORE8B	PERCENT1	MUST1	$NUM-TENS2A:7d*	PERCENT7
l
m	pro{zent}	nee	[MG]	[MG]	muss	siebzig	prozent
1431896 sh08 | 46-60m    And a lot of buildings were already remodeled at the time; about 90% was new.
r	TO-BUILD1*	WHAT1B*	$NUM-TEEN2A:9*	PERCENT1	ALREADY1A*	PRESENT-OR-HERE1*
l
m	bau bau	was	neunzig	prozent	schon
1177860 sh05 | 61+m    I’ll say on average, it’s 60 to 70 per cent more.
r	$NUM-TENS2A:7d	$NUM-TENS2A:6d	$NUM-TENS2A:7d	PERCENT1	MORE8B
l
m	siebzig	sechzig	siebzig	prozent	mehr
1584198 lei10 | 31-45m    If you are unemployed, they support you financially for three years, but the amount of money decreases over time, and then what?
r	TO-WORK2*	MONEY1C	TO-PAY3^*	PERCENT1	TO-DECREASE1*		AND-THEN2*
l						YEAR1B*
m	arb{eits}losengeld		unterstützen	prozent		drei	und dann
1431896 sh08 | 46-60m    I will never forget that there was an unemployment rate of 20%.
r	A-WHOLE-LOT2	OVER-OR-ABOUT1	$NUM-TENS2B:2*	PERCENT1	UNEMPLOYED1*
l
m	[MG]	über	zwanzig	prozent	arbeitslos
1178939 hh07 | 31-45f    I think about 20% just goes over their heads.
r		LIKE3A*	$NUM-TENS2A:2*	PERCENT1	$NUM-TENS2A:2*	PERCENT6*	TO-MISS-STH1B
l
m		wie	zwanzig	prozent	zwanzig	prozent	[MG]
1419931 ber12 | 31-45f    Maybe 2 percent.
r			$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:2	PERCENT1	MAYBE1
l
m			zwei	prozent	vielleicht
1210825 mue13 | 46-60m    I informed him that I would have about ninety per cent of theoretical input, and only ten per cent of practical training.
r	I2*	$GEST-TO-PONDER2^	$NUM-TENS1:9*	PERCENT1	INTERNSHIP1*	TO-WRITE1A^	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:10*
l
m			zeunzig	prozent		theorie	zehn
1210825 mue13 | 46-60m    When I got the interpreter, I had ninety-five per cent of theory, and only five per cent of practical training.
r	TO-HIRE1A*	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:5*	$NUM-TENS1:9*	PERCENT1	TO-WRITE1A^	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:5	PERCENT1*
l
m	…	fünfundneunzig		prozent	theorie	fünf	pro{zent}
1413251 stu07 | 31-45m    But that would automatically mean that the two of us, being profoundly deaf, wouldn’t have to try at all in the hearing world.
r	FULL2B*	ZERO1A	ZERO6A*	PERCENT1	TROUBLE1*	TO-GIVE2*	FOR1
l
m	voll	null	null	prozent	mühe	geb	für
1584617 lei12 | 61+m    But my wife and daughter haven’t quite mastered sign language a hundred percent.
r	DAUGHTER1*	$INDEX1	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1	PERCENT1	EASY1	TO-SIGN1G	LANGUAGE4A
l
m	tochter		hundert	prozent	einwandfrei	gebärdensprache
1433543 mue07 | 31-45m    Wait, vine is wrong, that’s more in the area around Würzburg.
r			MORE1
l				PERCENT1	NO1A*	WRONG4*	I2*
m			mehr	prozent		falsch
1210825 mue13 | 46-60m    I got those ten questions one hundred per cent right, but I suppose that ten per cent of that were thanks to the interpreter.
r	I2*	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:10	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1	PERCENT1	TO-SAY1	MUST1A^	I2*
l
m			hundert	prozent	aber		zehn
1291892 mst12 | 31-45m    Although there had been a warning already, they didn't know what magnitude.
r	BUT1*	TO-KNOW-STH2B*	HOW-MUCH5	PERCENT1*	EARTHQUAKE1	TO-KNOW-STH2B*	NOT3B*
l
m	aber		wie viel	prozent	erdbeben
1212611 fra08 | 18-30f    But I didn’t use sign language 100%.
r	HOW-QUESTION2	SIGN-LANGUAGE1B	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1*	PERCENT1*	NOT3A*
l
m	wie	ge{bärden}sprache	hundert	prozent	nicht
1209077 mue06 | 18-30f    If someone's 100% deaf, a CI would be useless, because the cochlear nerve is broken then.
r		FULL1^*
l			$NUM-HUNDRED2	PERCENT1*	DEAF2	CI1	SENSE1
m			hundert	prozent	taub	c-i	sinnlos
1290359-… mst05 | 61+f    But then people get a CI, but it doesn't make everything perfectly good, though.
r	TO-THINK1B*	PROCEEDING1B^*	$GEST-OFF1^	PERCENT1*	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1	PERCENT7	BETTER1*
l
m	denken		[MG]		hundert	prozent	auch nicht besser
1184089 nue01 | 61+m    I am 100% certain.
r	I2*	TO-CALCULATE1*	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1d*	PERCENT1*
l
m	ich	rechne	hundert	prozent
1428038 koe05 | 46-60m    More than 60 percent of the U.S. citizens don't believe the moon landing is true.
r	$NUM-TENS2A:6d*	OVER-OR-ABOUT1	$NUM-TENS2A:6d*	PERCENT1*	TO-BELIEVE2A*	NOT3A	$INDEX1
l
m		über	sechzig	prozent	glauben
1177860 sh05 | 61+m    It has to close entirely?
r			$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1	PERCENT1*	FULL1*	CLOSING3*
l
m			hundert	prozent	voll	schließen
1177860 sh05 | 61+m    Yes, it has to close completely.
r			$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1*	PERCENT1*	CLOSE-DOOR1*
l
m			hundert	prozent	zu
1204239 stu05 | 61+m    But he is not completely sick yet.
r			$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1d*	PERCENT1*	TO-KNOW-STH-OR-SB2*	HE-SHE-IT2	NOT3A*
l
m			hundert	prozent	krank	er	noch nicht
1245390 fra04 | 61+m    If the talks were held in ASL, did you understand everything 100%?
r	$INDEX1	TO-INCLUDE-OR-TO-ADMIT1*	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1*	PERCENT1*	$INDEX1
l
m			hundert	prozent
1413683 ber02 | 46-60m    Before the fall of the Berlin Wall, almost 80% of the deaf people still had a job, whereas only 20% were unemployed.
r	TO-WORK1*	PRESENT-OR-HERE1*	$NUM-TENS2A:2*	PERCENT1*	TO-WORK1*	$MORPH-LESS2
l
m	arbeit	da	zwanzig	prozent	arbeitslos
1413683 ber02 | 46-60m    Nowadays, it's the other way around: only 20% have a job and 80% are unemployed.
r	NOW1	CONVERSELY1*	$NUM-TENS2A:2*	PERCENT1*	TO-WORK1	$NUM-TENS2A:8d*	PERCENT1*
l
m	jetzt	umgekehrt	zwanzig	prozent	arbeit	achtzig	prozent
1413683 ber02 | 46-60m    Nowadays, it's the other way around: only 20% have a job and 80% are unemployed.
r	PERCENT1*	TO-WORK1	$NUM-TENS2A:8d*	PERCENT1*	TO-WORK1*	$MORPH-LESS2*
l						$INDEX1*
m	prozent	arbeit	achtzig	prozent	arbeitslos
1418889 ber08 | 31-45f    But I only understood 30% of the translation.
r
l	TO-COMPREHEND1	ONLY2A	$NUM-TENS2A:3d*	PERCENT1*
m	begriff	nur	dreißig	prozent
1249620 mvp01 | 18-30m    50:50 percent.
r			$NUM-TENS2A:5*	PERCENT1*
l
m			fünfzig fünfzig	prozent
1178133 sh06 | 46-60f    But I don’t think they got full compensation for all the destruction.
r	TIMES3*	ALL2A^	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1*	PERCENT1*	TO-OBTAIN1*
l
m	mal		hundert	prozent	bekommen
1220195 hb05 | 61+f    They try to hide it; maybe 50 or 60 percent do have a C. That would be a lot, actually.
r	HOW-MUCH5*	$NUM-TENS2A:5	$NUM-TENS2A:6d	PERCENT1*	CI1	MUCH1C*
l
m	wie viel	fünfzig	sechzig	prozent	c-i	viel
1289462 mst01 | 46-60m    They gained many percentage points.
r		TO-SEE1	$ALPHA1:O	PERCENT1*
l
m			oh	pro{zent}
1250279 mvp04 | 46-60f    I can fully understand the interpreters.
r	$INDEX1	INTERPRETER3A*	$NUM-HUNDREDS1:1	PERCENT1*	FULL1*	$GEST-OFF1^
l
m			hundert	prozent	voll
1210825 mue13 | 46-60m    I probably didn’t get like eighty per cent and caught only about twenty per cent.
r	$GEST^	ALREADY1A*	$NUM-TENS2A:8d*	PERCENT1*	TO-LOSE1	$GEST^	$NUM-TENS2A:2
l
m		schon	achtzig	prozent	verloren		zwa{nzig} prozent
1210825 mue13 | 46-60m    I informed him that I would have about ninety per cent of theoretical input, and only ten per cent of practical training.
r	INTERNSHIP1*	TO-WRITE1A^	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:10*	PERCENT1*	INTERNSHIP1	OVER-AND-DONE1
l
m		theorie	zehn	pro{zent}	praktikum
1210825 mue13 | 46-60m    When I got the interpreter, I had ninety-five per cent of theory, and only five per cent of practical training.
r	PERCENT1	TO-WRITE1A^	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:5	PERCENT1*	INTERNSHIP1	TO-PUSH-TO-THE-SIDE1
l
m	prozent	theorie	fünf	pro{zent}	praktikum
1210825 mue13 | 46-60m    I got those ten questions one hundred per cent right, but I suppose that ten per cent of that were thanks to the interpreter.
r	MUST1A^	I2*	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:10	PERCENT1*	INTERPRETER1	FOR1*
l
m		zehn		prozent	dolmetscher	für
1210825 mue13 | 46-60m    He wouldn’t have had to, because the ninety per cent I delivered would have been enough.
r	ALL1C*	TO-ACCOMPLISH1C*	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:9*	PERCENT1*	TO-ACCOMPLISH1C*	ENOUGH1B	$GEST-DECLINE1^
l
m	alle	schaffen	neunzig	pro{zent}	schaffen	genug
1210825 mue13 | 46-60m    Most of the people coming to hospital are hearing.
r	SICK1*	HEARING1A*	MORE1*	PERCENT1*
l
m	…	hörend	mehr	prozent