$NUM-RELATION1^

= $NUM-RELATION1 (36 tokens)
by transcript \| by glosses \| by right neighbours \| by left neighbours
1290121 1290121 \| 31-45m The final score was 1:0 for the GDR.
R	END1A*	GDR4	GAIN1	$NUM-RELATION1:1d-0s
L	END1A*
M		d-d-r	gewinn	eins null
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m #Name1 got kicked out. In the Düsseldorf team, I insisted on kicking him out.
R	TO-DISMISS2*	I1	DUSSELDORF1	$NUM-RELATION1:1d-0	TO-DISMISS3*	$INDEX1
L
M	[MG]	ich	düsseldorf
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m But they beat Stuttgart two to one yesterday.
R	YESTERDAY1C	TO-BEAT1*	STUTTGART1	$NUM-RELATION1:2-1
L
M	gestern	[MG]	stuttgart	zwei eins
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m So, when playing against Cologne - well, the team is a joke, actually - we still lost two to one.
R	I1	$GEST-OFF1^	TO-LOSE5	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d*	I2*	$GEST-OFF1^*	I2*
L		$GEST-OFF1^
M	trotzdem	[MG]	[MG]	zwei eins	ich		ich
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m All right, two to one; wasn’t it four to two?
R				$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	$NUM-RELATION1:4-2	NO1A*
L
M				zwei eins	vier zw{ei}
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m I see!
R				$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	$GEST-OFF1^
L					$GEST-OFF1^
M				[MG]	[MG]
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Still, we narrowly beat them two to one, no that’s wrong, three to two. That’s right: three to two.
R		NEVERTHELESS5	BARELY1*	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d*	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	BARELY1*
L			BARELY1*				BARELY1*
M		trotzdem	knapp	zwei eins		zwei eins
1585089 1585089 \| 31-45m Yes, they won 2:1.
R		$GEST-OFF1^	TO-WIN1	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d
L		$GEST-OFF1^
M				zwei eins
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Still, we narrowly beat them two to one, no that’s wrong, three to two. That’s right: three to two.
R	BARELY1*	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d*	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	BARELY1*	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d
L	BARELY1*				BARELY1*
M	knapp	zwei eins		zwei eins		drei zwei	drei zwei
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Still, we narrowly beat them two to one, no that’s wrong, three to two. That’s right: three to two.
R	NEVERTHELESS5	BARELY1*	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d*	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	BARELY1*	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d
L		BARELY1*				BARELY1*
M	trotzdem	knapp	zwei eins		zwei eins		drei zwei
1290121 1290121 \| 31-45m I remember that Germany lost 3:2.
R		$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:1d	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:2d	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	TO-LOSE5	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d
L
M				drei zwei	verloren	drei zwei
1290121 1290121 \| 31-45m I remember that Germany lost 3:2.
R	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:2d	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	TO-LOSE5	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d
L
M		drei zwei	verloren	drei zwei
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Still, we narrowly beat them two to one, no that’s wrong, three to two. That’s right: three to two.
R	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d*	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	BARELY1*	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	BARELY1	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d
L			BARELY1*			BARELY1
M		zwei eins		drei zwei	drei zwei	knapp	drei zwei
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Still, we narrowly beat them two to one, no that’s wrong, three to two. That’s right: three to two.
R	$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	BARELY1*	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	BARELY1	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	I1
L		BARELY1*			BARELY1
M	zwei eins		drei zwei	drei zwei	knapp	drei zwei	ich
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Still, we narrowly beat them two to one, no that’s wrong, three to two. That’s right: three to two.
R	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	BARELY1	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	I1	END3	APPROXIMATELY1^*
L			BARELY1			END3
M	drei zwei	drei zwei	knapp	drei zwei	ich		[MG]
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m At half time we were already leading five or four to zero.
R	STILL5	ALREADY1A*	HIGH6	$NUM-RELATION1:4-0	$NUM-RELATION1:5-0	THATS-ALL1A*
L
M		schon	hoch	vier null	fünf null	[MG]
1205168 1205168 \| 18-30f Help me out here. The score was four to one, right?
R	$GEST-TO-PONDER2^*	MUST1	TO-HELP1*	$NUM-RELATION1:4-1*	RIGHT-OR-AGREED1A*
L			TO-HELP1*
M		muss	helfen	vier eins	stimmt
1184756 1184756 \| 31-45m So, I affectedly cheered, “Four to one. Yeah!”
R				$NUM-RELATION1:4-1d*	$GEST-TO-MAKE-A-FIST1^	TO-SEE-EACH-OTHER1^*	$GEST^
L					$GEST-TO-MAKE-A-FIST1^	TO-SEE-EACH-OTHER1^*	$GEST^
M				vier eins	[MG]	[MG]
1205168 1205168 \| 18-30f Four to one.
R				$NUM-RELATION1:4-1d*
L
M				vier eins
1184756 1184756 \| 31-45m We hugged, and he said, “Four to one. What do you think about that?”
R			$GEST^	$NUM-RELATION1:4-1d*	$GEST^	I2*	$GEST^
L			$GEST^		$GEST^		$GEST^
M			[MG]	vier eins
1420216 1420216 \| 18-30m Germany won against Argentina 4:1.
R	GERMAN1	AGAINST5B*	ARGENTINA3*	$NUM-RELATION1:4-1d*
L		AGAINST5B*	ARGENTINA3*
M	deutschland	gegen	argentinien	vier eins
1184756 1184756 \| 18-30f On Sunday, Germany won four to one against England. That was awesome!
R	GERMAN1	AGAINST3C	ENGLAND4	$NUM-RELATION1:4-1d	REMARKABLE1
L		AGAINST3C
M	deutschland		england	vier eins	[MG]
1205168 1205168 \| 18-30f Because of the shot against the bar that went over the line, the players got more excited and played more aggressively.
R				$NUM-RELATION1:4-1	THROUGH2A	$PROD	THROUGH2A
L						$PROD
M				vier eins	durch
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Ugh, you’re right. We lost four to two.
R			RIGHT-OR-AGREED1A*	$NUM-RELATION1:4-2d*	TO-LOSE5	I2*	$GEST^
L							$GEST^
M			stimmt	vier zwei
1205168 1205168 \| 18-30f It would have been four to two.
R			USUALLY1*	$NUM-RELATION1:4-2d*
L			USUALLY1*
M			normal{erweise}	vier zwei
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Didn’t you score two to four?
R			YOU1	$NUM-RELATION1:4-2	YOU1	TRIVIAL1^
L
M				vier zu zwei
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m All right, two to one; wasn’t it four to two?
R			$NUM-RELATION1:2d-1d	$NUM-RELATION1:4-2	NO1A*
L
M			zwei eins	vier zw{ei}
1420216 1420216 \| 18-30m I also went to the public screening when Germany won against England 4:0.
R		OR1*	ENGLAND4	$NUM-RELATION1:4d-0*	INVOLVED1A	TO-WATCH1*	INVOLVED1A*
L					INVOLVED1A	TO-WATCH1*	INVOLVED1A*
M		oder	england	vier null	dabei
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m At half time we were already leading five or four to zero.
R	ALREADY1A*	HIGH6	$NUM-RELATION1:4-0	$NUM-RELATION1:5-0	THATS-ALL1A*
L
M	schon	hoch	vier null	fünf null	[MG]
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m And we won five to zero against Cologne, remember that?
R	$INDEX1	ALSO1A*	I1	$NUM-RELATION1:5-0	$INDEX1
L
M	köln	auch		f{ünf} null
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Five to one.
R				$NUM-RELATION1:5-1d
L
M				fünf {zu} eins
1429124-13403249-13545507 1429124-… \| 18-30m Six or five to one?
R		HOW-MUCH3A*	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1A:6d*	$NUM-RELATION1:5-1d
L
M		wie viel	sechs	fünf eins
1290121 1290121 \| 31-45m There was this one match against the GDR, and they played extremely strong and beat Germany 1:0.
R		STRONG1B	TO-PLAY2*		TO-WRITE2C^*
L	HOWEVER1A	STRONG1B	TO-PLAY2*	$NUM-RELATION1:1d-0*		$NUM-RELATION1:1d-0*
M	doch	stark	gespielt		steht	eins null
1290121 1290121 \| 31-45m There was this one match against the GDR, and they played extremely strong and beat Germany 1:0.
R	TO-PLAY2*		TO-WRITE2C^*
L	TO-PLAY2*	$NUM-RELATION1:1d-0*		$NUM-RELATION1:1d-0*
M	gespielt		steht	eins null
1290121 1290121 \| 31-45m In the beginning the score was 1:0 for Argentina.
R
L				$NUM-RELATION1:1d-0s*	FOR1	ARGENTINA1*
M				eins null	für	argen{tinien}
1290121 1290121 \| 31-45m I don't know where it took place, but the final score was 3:2 for Argentina.
R						$INDEX1*
L		WHERE3*	$INDEX1	$NUM-RELATION1:3d-2d	I1	$INDEX1*
M		wo		drei zwei

Show this Type in in

MY DGS – ANNIS

MY DGS – iLex