UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^
≙ UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ (14 tokens) |
|||||||
| by transcript | by glosses | by right neighbours | by left neighbours | |||||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m I think a common sign language would only be possible amongst deaf people. | |||||||
| R | CAN2A | IMAGINATION1A* | I1 | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^* | ONLY2A | DEAF1A* | EVERYWHERE1* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | |||||||
| M | kann | vorstellen | einheit | nur | |||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m In my opinion, a common sign language is not possible. | |||||||
| R | TO-STAY3* | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | POSSIBLE2* | I1 | |||
| L | |||||||
| M | einheit | ||||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m Well, it would be difficult to have a common language for everyone. | |||||||
| R | $GEST^ | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | RENT1^ | ||||
| L | |||||||
| M | einheitlich | schwer | |||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m It should be standardized in Germany; I’m in favor of that. | |||||||
| R | OVER-OR-ABOUT1 | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | I1 | FOR1 | GERMAN1 | ||
| L | |||||||
| M | über | ein{heitlich} | dafür | deutsch | |||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m I'm obviously in favor of having a standardized sign language in Germany. | |||||||
| R | GERMAN1 | COUNTRY1A* | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | OF-COURSE1A* | I1 | FOR1* | |
| L | |||||||
| M | deutsch | einheitlich | dafür | ||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m I am, however, in favor of standardized signs in Germany. | |||||||
| R | $ORAL^ | TO-SAY1 | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | CLEAR1B* | FOR1* | $GEST-OFF1^ | |
| L | |||||||
| M | aber | einheitlich | klar | für | |||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m Are you in favor of one common sign language in Europe? | |||||||
| R | EUROPE1A | $INDEX1 | IMAGINATION1A* | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | $GEST^ | ||
| L | |||||||
| M | europa | ||||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m But I can’t imagine a common sign language enshrined in law. | |||||||
| R | REALLY2* | TO-ACKNOWLEDGE1 | STATUTE1B | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | I1 | CAN2A* | IMAGINATION1A* |
| L | |||||||
| M | einheit | kann nicht | vorstellen | ||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m For instance schools in Hesse don’t have their own books, instead they have the same all over Germany in all of the states now. | |||||||
| R | TO-BELONG1 | NOT-ANYMORE1A | FUTURE1B* | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | |||
| L | |||||||
| M | hessen | nicht mehr | zukunft | einheitlich | |||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m Let me ask you a question: Can you imagine traveling through Europe, and people using the same sign language everywhere? | |||||||
| R | IMAGINATION1A* | CAN1 | EUROPE1A | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | EQUAL8* | TO-SIGN1G | |
| L | |||||||
| M | vorstellen | kann | europa | ||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m I don’t think a common sign language will be constituted. | |||||||
| R | ALL3* | $GEST-OFF1^ | MY1* | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | POSSIBLE1* | ||
| L | |||||||
| M | einheitlich | ||||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m Grade specific school books are the same in Germany. | |||||||
| R | BOOK1B* | FUTURE1B | EQUAL8* | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | |||
| L | |||||||
| M | zukunft | [MG] | einheitlich | ||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m It should be standardized in Germany; I’m in favor of that. | |||||||
| R | I1 | FOR1 | GERMAN1 | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | |||
| L | |||||||
| M | dafür | deutsch | einheitlich | ||||
| 1184536 1184536 | 46-60m Look, that’s the advantage of the United States: The country extends over the whole continent, and people use one common language there. | |||||||
| R | HEADING1^ | HEADING1^* | USA2 | UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^ | |||
| L | |||||||
| M | u-s-a | ||||||