AUDIOGRAM1^



frontal

45°

90°

from above

≙ AUDIOGRAM1^ (1 token)
by transcript \| by glosses \| by right neighbours \| by left neighbours
1248090 1248090 \| 31-45m Someone told me that it’s pretty important in Germany to have the dubbed sound of a movie. It’s supposed to be important.
R	IMPORTANT1*	IMPORTANT-$CANDIDATE-GOE16^	EAR1^	AUDIOGRAM1^*	EAR1^*	IMPORTANT-$CANDIDATE-GOE16^
L	IMPORTANT1*	IMPORTANT-$CANDIDATE-GOE16^				IMPORTANT-$CANDIDATE-GOE16^
M	wichtig		ton		ton	wichtig
= AUDIOGRAM1 (5 tokens)
Mouth: ∅
frontal 45° 90° from above
Translational equivalent: audiogram
by transcript \| by glosses \| by right neighbours \| by left neighbours
1431224 1431224 \| 31-45f Hold on, did they do the audiograms in New Zealand and not before hand?
R	PLANT1^*	$INDEX1	$INDEX1*	AUDIOGRAM1*	BEFOREHAND2	$GEST-OFF1^
L	PLANT1^*		$INDEX1*		BEFOREHAND2	$GEST-OFF1^
M	neuseeland		audiogramm		vorher
1413703 1413703 \| 46-60m The lower limit shouldn’t be at 55% but at perhaps 70% [decibel is what he meant].
R				AUDIOGRAM1	$NUM-ONE-TO-TEN1B:5	PERCENT7	NOT3A
L						PERCENT7
M				audiogramm		pro{zent}	nee
1431277-12422631-12464143 1431277-… \| 31-45m Was the decision based on the audiogram?
R				AUDIOGRAM1
L
M
1431277-12422631-12464143 1431277-… \| 31-45f I didn’t want them to group the children based on their audiograms.
R	$INDEX1	DEPENDENT3	WHAT1A	AUDIOGRAM1	GROUP1A*	DIFFERENT1*	CLASS5*
L		DEPENDENT3	WHAT1A		GROUP1A*	DIFFERENT1*	CLASS5*
M			was				klasse
1431277-12422631-12464143 1431277-… \| 31-45m Maybe some children are able to use sign language, but the hearing parents want classes based on the results of the audiometry.
R	PARENTS1B	TO-WISH1A*	TO-JOIN1*	AUDIOGRAM1
L	PARENTS1B		TO-JOIN1*
M	eltern	wünsch

Show this Type in in

MY DGS – ANNIS

MY DGS – iLex

Download Options

Types ID	Gloss	HamNoSys	Mouth	iLex	ELAN	SRT	Video frontal	Video 45°	Video 90°	Video from above	Pose
85133	AUDIOGRAM1^		∅
85134	AUDIOGRAM1		∅