| by transcript | by glosses | by right neighbours | by left neighbours |
| 1419370 ber10 | 18-30m
Communication assistants are better used in settings like small and easy conversations. |
| R |
| | COMMUNICATION1A* | ASSISTANCE-$CANDIDATE-BER22^* | $INDEX2 | TO-MATCH3 | $GEST-OFF1^ |
| L |
|
| M |
komm{unikations}ass{istent} | | passt | [MG] |
| 1419370 ber10 | 18-30m
I was a bit confused, because until then I had had a very positive view of communication assistants. |
| R |
I1 | TO-THINK1B | COMMUNICATION1A | ASSISTANCE-$CANDIDATE-BER22^* | I1 | GOOD1* | $GEST-OFF1^ |
| L |
| | |
| M |
ich | denk | kommu{nikations}ass{istenz} | [MG] |
| 1419370 ber10 | 18-30m
But with communication assistants I have to adapt to their competence in signing and can’t sign as I please. |
| R |
| | COMMUNICATION1A* | ASSISTANCE-$CANDIDATE-BER22^ | MEANING1* | I1* | MUST1 |
| L |
| | |
| M |
komm{unikations}assis{tent} | bedeut | muss |
| 1419370 ber10 | 18-30m
How do you feel about communication assistance - does it really make sense? |
| R |
FEELING3* | TO-SEE1* | COMMUNICATION1A* | ASSISTANCE-$CANDIDATE-BER22^ | FOR1* | $GEST-OFF1^* | $$EXTRA-LING-ACT^* |
| L |
| $$EXTRA-LING-ACT^ |
| M |
| | kommunikationsassistent | | | |
| 1419370 ber10 | 18-30m
He said communication assistants were crap and that he’d like to get rid of them. |
| R |
TO-SAY1* | BAD-OR-STALE1* | COMMUNICATION1A* | ASSISTANCE-$CANDIDATE-BER22^ | BAD-OR-STALE2A* | TO-WANT8 | TO-REJECT2 |
| L |
| |
| M |
sagt | [MG] | kommunik{ations}assistenz | [MG] | will | [MG] |
| 1419370 ber10 | 18-30m
So, I’m going to be booking communication assistants anyway, let’s see how that turns out! |
| R |
TO-GET2* | | COMMUNICATION1A* | ASSISTANCE-$CANDIDATE-BER22^ | TO-DEVELOP1B | $GEST-OFF1^ | TO-LOOK1* |
| L |
| TO-GET1A | |
| M |
sowieso | | kommun{ikations}assistent | | | |
| 1419370 ber10 | 18-30m
Okay, back to the topic ‘communication assistance’. |
| R |
AND1^ | YOU1 | COMMUNICATION1A* | ASSISTANCE-$CANDIDATE-BER22^ | | | |
| L |
| |
| M |
| | kommunikationsassistent |
