@inproceedings{lepp:26032:sign-lang:lrec,
  author    = {Lepp, Lisa and De Sisto, Mirella and Shterionov, Dimitar},
  title     = {Two-Handed Signs and Handedness: Phonological Implications for Sign Language Structure},
  pages     = {275--286},
  editor    = {Efthimiou, Eleni and Fotinea, Stavroula-Evita and Hanke, Thomas and Hochgesang, Julie A. and Mesch, Johanna and Schulder, Marc},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the {LREC2026} 12th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Language in Motion},
  maintitle = {15th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation ({LREC} 2026)},
  publisher = {{European Language Resources Association (ELRA)}},
  address   = {Palma, Mallorca, Spain},
  day       = {16},
  month     = may,
  year      = {2026},
  isbn      = {978-2-493814-82-1},
  language  = {english},
  url       = {https://www.sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de/lrec/pub/26032.html},
  abstract  = {Handedness ---the use of one versus two hands in sign production--- has traditionally been discussed in relation to dominance and symmetry conditions, yet it remains underrepresented in formal phonological models of sign languages. This paper argues that handedness constitutes a core phonological parameter that directly influences the structure and interaction of movement, handshape, location, and orientation. Building on hierarchical and dependency-based approaches, we propose an adapted phonological dependency model that explicitly integrates handedness in the representation of manual articulators. In one-handed signs, features are specified for a single active hand. In two-handed signs, feature distribution is constrained by symmetry and dominance conditions, which regulate whether the hands must share features or may differ in a structurally restricted way. This structural encoding accounts for variation phenomena such as weak add, weak prop, and weak drop as constrained adjustments within the phonological system. From a technical perspective, this refinement suggests more formal restrictiveness and empirical discriminability within the feature geometries, reduced representational ambiguity, and improved empirical testability across theoretical, corpus-based, and computational implementations, strengthening the interface between phonological theory and sign language technology.}
}